In a fiery commentary, Megyn Kelly has slammed pop superstar Taylor Swift for endorsing Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, particularly criticizing Swift’s stance on policies surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and gender transitions. Kelly’s remarks come amid increasing scrutiny over celebrity endorsements and the political stances celebrities like Swift are taking — stances that, according to Kelly, may not reflect the broader public’s concerns.
A Hot Take on Swift’s Endorsement
Kelly didn’t hold back when discussing Taylor Swift’s public endorsement of Harris and Walz, which she made following the latest political debates. “I don’t have a problem with celebrities sharing their political opinions,” Kelly began, “but when those opinions are tied to radical policies that impact children and families, it’s worth addressing — especially when it’s someone with as much influence as Taylor Swift.”
Swift’s endorsement of Harris, largely motivated by her support for LGBTQ+ rights and reproductive policies, has drawn both praise and backlash. Swift, an outspoken advocate for various progressive causes, has long been associated with liberal ideologies. But it was her vocal support for Tim Walz — particularly his stance on issues like gender-affirming care for minors — that caught Kelly’s attention.
“Taylor Swift wants to champion LGBTQ+ policies, including transitioning children without parental consent,” Kelly stated, visibly frustrated. “She is actively supporting a platform that allows children to undergo medical procedures — procedures like gender-affirming surgeries — outside the approval of their own parents. This is deeply disturbing.”
“Childless Cat Lady” and the Absurdity of Elite Politics
Kelly’s critique didn’t stop at Swift’s politics. She also took aim at the singer’s apparent disconnect from the issues faced by the everyday American. In a pointed comment, Kelly referred to Swift as a “childless cat lady” — a jab at Swift’s choice to remain child-free, which Kelly used to underscore the singer’s inability to understand the real-life consequences of the policies she supports.
“This is a woman who has no children of her own and yet wants to dictate what happens to children across this country,” Kelly said. “She has the luxury of living in her billion-dollar bubble, free from the realities that most American families face. She’s so out of touch, it’s laughable.”
Kelly’s “childless cat lady” remark was a direct dig at Swift’s personal life choices, which have been widely discussed in the media. While Swift has always been candid about her decision to focus on her career and not rush into motherhood, Kelly used it to illustrate the broader point that celebrities often promote policies without fully understanding their impact.
The Bigger Picture: Elite Influence on Politics
The conversation quickly expanded to the larger issue of celebrity influence in politics. Kelly argued that Swift’s endorsement wasn’t an isolated incident, but part of a growing trend of wealthy, influential celebrities pushing political narratives that may not align with the majority of Americans.
“You have people like Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce, and countless others — these ultra-wealthy elites who are so out of touch with the struggles of regular people. They get to spout off on policies, endorse politicians, and push radical ideas because they live in a completely different world,” Kelly said, pointing out that celebrities like Swift have become the mouthpieces of progressive movements, particularly on the left.
“But the real question is — what do they actually understand about the lives of the people they’re speaking for?” Kelly added. “They’re more concerned with their next sold-out stadium show or endorsement deal than the consequences of the laws they’re backing.”
Hypocrisy and Double Standards
Kelly also touched on what she perceived as a double standard in how public figures are treated based on their political leanings. She highlighted the backlash that celebrities like Britney Mahomes, who had publicly expressed support for Donald Trump, faced. According to Kelly, when a celebrity endorses a more conservative viewpoint, the backlash is swift and intense, while more liberal stances are often lauded without much criticism.
“Britney Mahomes gets trashed for supporting Trump, but when Taylor Swift supports Harris — especially on issues that are so divisive — she’s hailed as a hero,” Kelly pointed out. “There’s a glaring double standard in how these endorsements are treated, and it’s time to call it out.”
Conclusion: The Divide Between Celebrities and Voters
Kelly’s rant ended with a scathing critique of the way celebrities engage with politics. She emphasized the importance of voters making informed decisions, separate from the influence of wealthy and influential celebrities who may not fully grasp the implications of their endorsements.
“The bottom line is this: voters need to do their own research, stay informed, and make choices based on what’s best for the country, not based on who’s endorsing who,” Kelly concluded. “Because while Taylor Swift and her fellow elites are living their lives in their multi-million-dollar mansions, the rest of us are dealing with the fallout from the policies they cheerlead.”
As the 2024 election approaches, the intersection of celebrity culture and politics is bound to continue dominating the headlines. Whether or not Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz will resonate with her massive fanbase remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Megyn Kelly, along with many others, is not backing down from calling out what she sees as the disconnect between elite celebrities and the everyday American voter.
