In the ongoing debate about the AFC North, the Pittsburgh Steelers and Cincinnati Bengals have emerged as focal points, and I find myself lacking confidence in the Bengals compared to the Steelers. Here’s why.

First and foremost, the Steelers boast a formidable defense. Ranked among the top in the league, they excel in key metrics such as scoring defense and red zone efficiency. This defensive strength provides a reliable foundation, allowing the offense to operate with less pressure. When a team can consistently make stops, it alleviates some of the burdens on the quarterback, making it easier for the offense to find its rhythm.

On the other hand, the Bengals have struggled defensively. While they have a potent offense led by Joe Burrow, the defense often leaves much to be desired. For Cincinnati to succeed, Burrow and the offense must be nearly flawless, which is a heavy burden to bear. Given the competitive nature of the AFC North, relying solely on offensive output without a solid defensive backing is a precarious strategy.

Moreover, the Bengals’ track record in September raises concerns. Historically, they have started slow, which suggests potential issues with preparation and consistency. If they cannot begin the season strong, it puts them at a disadvantage in the tightly contested AFC North.

While the Bengals might have a higher offensive ceiling, the Steelers’ well-rounded approach makes them the more balanced team. They have proven they can win games even when their offense isn’t firing on all cylinders, thanks to their defense.

Ultimately, in a division as competitive as the AFC North, having a dependable defense can often be the difference between success and failure. This is why I lean toward the Steelers over the Bengals when evaluating their prospects for the remainder of the season. The combination of Pittsburgh’s strong defense and the uncertainty surrounding Cincinnati’s ability to consistently perform under pressure gives me reason to doubt the Bengals in this matchup.