At 87, Bill Wyman Reveals Why No One CAN STAND Mick Jagger.. | HO

Mick Jagger – a legendary rock icon with a dazzling career, but also the focal point of many conflicts and controversies. In this video, we uncover an untold story from Bill Wyman, the quiet yet steadfast bassist of The Rolling Stones, who has decided to share the secrets hidden behind the glitz and glamour.

From internal conflicts with Keith Richards and Charlie Watts to tense relationships with artists like David Bowie and Rod Stewart, Jagger not only shaped the history of music but also left behind deep cracks in personal and professional relationships. How could a man with such relentless ambition elevate The Rolling Stones to unparalleled heights while simultaneously creating irreparable fractures within the group?

Bill Wyman, the long-time bassist of The Rolling Stones, is a figure often overshadowed by the flamboyance and charisma of his bandmates, particularly Mick Jagger. Throughout the band’s incredible career, Jagger was always the central figure, his larger-than-life personality dominating both the stage and the media.

However, Wyman’s decision to speak out in his later years has opened a window into the darker, less glamorous side of the band’s dynamic, particularly his tumultuous relationship with Jagger. In a candid revelation, Wyman shared his perspective on why Mick Jagger became such a polarizing figure and why, after decades of working together, many could no longer stand him.

Mick Jagger’s immense talent and charisma were pivotal to The Rolling Stones’ rise to global superstardom. His unique voice, captivating stage presence, and strategic mind for the business side of music helped shape the band into one of the most successful and enduring rock acts of all time.

However, Jagger’s drive for control and his unwavering ambition also created deep fractures within the band. Bill Wyman, who was often relegated to the background compared to Jagger and Keith Richards, felt the weight of these tensions more than anyone.

For years, Wyman silently played his role as the steady and reliable bassist, contributing to some of the band’s most iconic tracks. Yet, despite his critical role in shaping the sound of the Stones, Wyman often felt ignored, dismissed, and undervalued by Mick Jagger.

In interviews, Wyman revealed that Jagger rarely, if ever, consulted the band members when it came to major decisions about the band’s future. “He didn’t ask for my opinion,” Wyman said, sharing the frustration that the band’s direction was often dictated by Jagger without any input from the others.

This control over the band’s direction wasn’t just limited to the music itself. Jagger’s influence extended to the business decisions, media engagements, and even the songwriting. Wyman admitted that he would frequently offer suggestions and ideas, but his contributions were often disregarded.

For him, the feeling of being sidelined became increasingly difficult to ignore. “Sometimes I wondered if I was still part of the band or just a bassist playing on command,” he confessed. Jagger’s obsession with keeping the spotlight on himself was another contributing factor to the rift between the two. The Rolling Stones may have been a collective effort, but Jagger’s constant need for attention often overshadowed the rest of the band’s contributions.

This sense of exclusion didn’t just stem from Jagger’s decision-making; it was also evident in the way he treated his bandmates. Jagger, who viewed himself as the heart and soul of The Rolling Stones, seemed to believe that the success of the band was more about his vision and leadership than any of the other members’ talents.

As a result, Wyman, along with the other band members, often felt like mere supporting players in Jagger’s grand show. “The Rolling Stones was always ‘Mick Jagger’s band’ in many people’s eyes,” Wyman noted. For someone who had been part of the group from the very beginning, this constant overshadowing was hard to swallow.

The relationship between Wyman and Jagger continued to deteriorate throughout the years, and it wasn’t just about creative differences. It was also about respect—or the lack thereof. Jagger’s relentless pursuit of his own agenda often led to a lack of consideration for the feelings of the other band members.

His tendency to make key decisions about the band’s future without consulting the others created an environment of resentment. Wyman, who had been a steadfast member of the band for decades, felt like he was merely an employee, not an equal partner.

This imbalance reached a breaking point in the early 1990s when Wyman made the difficult decision to leave The Rolling Stones. By then, Wyman had grown tired of the internal dynamics of the band, where Mick Jagger’s leadership was seen as dictatorial, and the collaborative spirit of the early years had all but evaporated. Wyman later remarked that he felt the band lost something important after his departure—a sense of unity and shared vision that had once made The Rolling Stones a special and groundbreaking group.

The problems between Wyman and Jagger were not isolated; they reflected deeper tensions within the band. Jagger’s relationship with guitarist Keith Richards was also fraught with conflict. The two men, while undeniably talented, were often at odds, with Richards’ freewheeling, rebellious approach to rock and roll often clashing with Jagger’s meticulous, control-driven nature.

Over the years, their rivalry became legendary, and it played out publicly through various feuds and disagreements. Despite this, Richards and Jagger managed to continue collaborating and making iconic music together. However, their relationship reached a low point during the recording of Dirty Work in the mid-1980s, when Jagger’s growing focus on his solo career caused tensions to boil over.

In addition to his issues with Wyman and Richards, Mick Jagger also had a contentious relationship with drummer Charlie Watts. Watts, the steady backbone of The Rolling Stones, was known for his calm and unflappable demeanor. Yet even he, despite his dedication to the band, occasionally found himself at odds with Jagger. Watts, unlike Jagger, was never one for showmanship and rarely sought the limelight. Still, he too felt the strain of Jagger’s autocratic leadership.

An infamous moment occurred in the 1980s when Jagger referred to Watts as “my drummer” in a conversation with Richards. Watts, who saw himself as an equal member of the band, immediately corrected Jagger, a rare outburst from the usually quiet drummer. This exchange highlighted the frustrations that had been simmering under the surface for years.

Jagger’s dominance also extended to his personal relationships. His charisma and good looks made him a magnet for some of the world’s most famous women, but these relationships were often marked by emotional distance and infidelity.

His highly publicized relationships with women like Marianne Faithfull, Bianca Jagger, and Jerry Hall were constantly under the media microscope, and his ability to detach emotionally from those around him became a recurring theme in his personal life. Faithfull, who had a long-term relationship with Jagger, described him as captivating but emotionally inaccessible. This inability to connect on a deeper level ultimately led to the end of their relationship, along with many others.

As Mick Jagger grows older, the long-buried grievances of his bandmates and peers have come to light. Bill Wyman’s revelations about the toxic dynamics within The Rolling Stones serve as a powerful reminder of how personal ambition and ego can shape, and often fracture, even the most successful partnerships.

While Jagger’s contributions to rock and roll cannot be denied, Wyman’s story sheds light on the toll that the relentless pursuit of control can take on the relationships and creativity of those involved. Mick Jagger may have been the face of The Rolling Stones, but Bill Wyman’s account reveals the hidden truth behind the scenes—a truth of tension, rivalry, and the price of fame.